| | Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Giant González Closed 3:00-3:15pm

Gender: Number of posts: 4056 Registration date: 2008-04-28
 | Subject: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:25 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Giant González Closed 3:00-3:15pm

Gender: Number of posts: 4056 Registration date: 2008-04-28
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:34 pm | |
| I'd say no, although I read it about 10 times when I was 14... Now I read it a lot less frequently. Brilliant book though, certainly not strictly for the teens. |
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1609 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:37 pm | |
| I would agree; its brilliance goes along with its genre, of growing-up books about the protagonist's education, formal and otherwise. It made a writer out of not a few fans. |
|
 | |
Eddie Head Librarian

Gender: Number of posts: 2394 Registration date: 2008-07-30
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:45 pm | |
| Yes, it's in the genre John references, along with, say, Laurie Lee's "Cider With Rosie". _________________ The salmon-falls, the mackerel-crowded seas
|
|
 | |
JBWilkes

Number of posts: 63 Registration date: 2008-08-16
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:56 pm | |
| Personally, I hated the thing when i read it high school. Hated hated hated it! Although now I do recognize it as a generally great book, I still wouldn't care to read it again. Contrary to popular belief, to my knowledge, a lot of teens don't care for the book either; but of course there are still a lot who do. Generally the class opinion is split down the middle. |
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1609 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:05 pm | |
| Dunno about class (socio-economic? school?), but it's very well handled, at minimum, and is a lot easier to get thro than its apparent half-model, Dickens.. |
|
 | |
audreyfan1

Gender: Number of posts: 628 Registration date: 2008-11-14
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:13 pm | |
| My brother bought it for me last Xmas, but I still haven't read it yet. And now that's school's started again, I won't be doing any leisurely reading until next summer or maybe Xmas break. Either way, I won't get around to reading it for a couple months. |
|
 | |
LaRue The Boss

Gender: Number of posts: 991 Registration date: 2008-04-28
 | Subject: Re: Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:06 pm | |
| Love this book. First read it when I was 14, felt like such a BAMF!  |
|
 | |
| | Catcher in the Rye: Strictly for teenagers? | |
|