| | A reasonable denial of God | |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
ISN Torin's Mum

Number of posts: 1380 Registration date: 2008-05-28
 | |
 | |
Le Néant Dr. Darwin Spacetime

Gender: Number of posts: 1161 Registration date: 2008-06-08
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:39 pm | |
| Mellencamp: unless you work for the Australian departement that deals with this sort of situation, I assume that it's not up to you to decide what has to happen. ISN's situation is a very complex one and she has had the remarkable courage to talk of her own mistakes on this site even before she started speaking of things other people have done. That's very courageous and extremely difficult if you ask me. This might suprise you, but even people who have a hard time getting through in life love their childeren. The fact that ISN and most likely also her ex-partner probably genuinely love Torin - and that he, for better or for worse, in return most likely also loves his parents - never arrises in your cold judgemental reasoning. When I was still in school I didn't an internship in what most people would probably call a fosterhome - most childeren there came from disfunctional families, if I remember correctly none were orphans. These childeren sometimes had a rather unpleasant time when they spend the weekend with (one of) their parents, but they would litteraly go nuts when their parents didn't pick them up for one reason or another. So I don't think it's very usefull to start attacking ISN so viciously and personaly here on this site. She's obviously going through a difficult phase in her life. There's no need for any of us to make it even worse for her. _________________ Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.
|
|
 | |
George Michael

Number of posts: 20 Registration date: 2009-06-16
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:00 pm | |
| | Le Néant wrote: | | Mellencamp: unless you work for the Australian departement that deals with this sort of situation, I assume that it's not up to you to decide what has to happen. |
Gee, thanks Le Néant. For a minute there I was under the impression that posting my opinion on a message board put me in charge of ISN's life. Thanks for straightening me out. |
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:26 pm | |
| I dunno, M - I dunno if you don't get it, or don't care whether you get it or not. To say again what's been said a few times now, people are asking you to take into account the effect of your opinion on someone working thro a difficult situation. Heedlessness of consequennces of your expression of opinion on someone else's state of mind and meotions is in itself cruel and moree than a bit thoughtless. As an old boss once said to me - it was long ago - "Think, before you ink." OK? Just hang out a while longer, you'll get it, I hope - John |
|
 | |
Le Néant Dr. Darwin Spacetime

Gender: Number of posts: 1161 Registration date: 2008-06-08
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:09 pm | |
| | Mellencampfan32 wrote: | Gee, thanks Le Néant. For a minute there I was under the impression that posting my opinion on a message board put me in charge of ISN's life. Thanks for straightening me out. |
Ooh you are surely not in charge of her lifel But here at ATU, believe it or not, we tend to be gentle on each other whenever we feel that that's the way to go. Right now, ISN doesn't need depressing judgements from people that don't know her. So we try to give her the only feeble thing a message board can offer: a place where she can speak out her heart without having to fear to be jugded too lightly. You're free to post harsh replies to other members' posts if the circumstances allow you to - nobody is going to jump out the window if Uzi started calling me Le Choco Belge. In this case the circumstances are different. So I would like to urge you to either leave it for what it is or to try to be supportive. Here on ATU we like our moderators to use a hands-off approach and this has always worked very well. In this particular case I did contact them asking to lock this thread IF more mean messages would pop up. There's plenty of members here that you can bash a little bit and who'll know to take it with a sense of humour. But ISN's current situation can not be taken lightly. If this thread gets locked, it's not the autocratic self-rightous mods: it's me. _________________ Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.
|
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:18 pm | |
| We can always go back to the original thread-topic and bore everybody to death.... (Only kidding - I've got me long rifle unrusted....) |
|
 | |
Le Néant Dr. Darwin Spacetime

Gender: Number of posts: 1161 Registration date: 2008-06-08
 | |
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:47 pm | |
| You probably move too fast for me. But do you think the analogy of God as Watchmaker has anything to it? |
|
 | |
ISN Torin's Mum

Number of posts: 1380 Registration date: 2008-05-28
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:12 am | |
| Thanks Andy - eloquent as usual  _________________ Your builders outdo your destroyers - Isaiah 49 - 17
|
|
 | |
President Eisenhower King of Pop

Gender: Number of posts: 3135 Registration date: 2008-05-05
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:40 am | |
| I've been ignoring this thread because it's called "A reasonable denial of God" and denials or affirmations of God are tedious to me, but now it seems to have taken some sort of dramatic turn, but I can't sort it out because there are too many pages of posts. i blame Andy Neant for giving his thread such a tedious name. God, no God, who cares? I think they should rename God or No God "zzzzzzzzzzzzzz" cause metaphysics or anti-metaphysics is mucho boring. Why? YOU'RE A MOSTLY HAIRLESS APE WHO OVERESTIMATES YOUR CLEVERNESS BECAUSE YOU CAN TALK AND BUILD MOTORCYCLES BUT YOU ARE NOT SO CLEVER SO STOP TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE UNIVERSE BECAUSE YOU WON'T. YOUR ODDS OF DOING SO ARE ONLY SLIGHTLY BETTER THAN THOSE OF A CHIMPANZEE SO GIVE IT A REST. Stupid fucking simians. _________________ The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without.
|
|
 | |
Le Néant Dr. Darwin Spacetime

Gender: Number of posts: 1161 Registration date: 2008-06-08
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:41 pm | |
| | John McLaughlin wrote: | | You probably move too fast for me. But do you think the analogy of God as Watchmaker has anything to it? |
I suppose that's analogy borrowed from Plato (the Demiurg)? Though it's an interesting perspective, I personally don't buy. I'm afraid that my believes are based on cold and almost empty principles: strings, coincidence, ... And yet, even when you follow this atheïstic doctrince you can't help but wonder how it all ended up being the universe as we know it. If you take the fundamental matter - let's assume it's strings to make this easy - you still need it to interact with itself and the vaccuum in a very precise way if you want this world to be its result. You can take a supercomputer - the ones that do one trillion calculation per second - and give it all the fundamental building blocks we believe to make up our reality and ask it to start testing scenarios with those elements. What you will discover is that it can produce litteraly hundreds of billions of scenarios where the outcome is pretty much ... nothing. So the interaction between these elements has to happen in an extremely precise way. And, even when you follow these cold and strictly mathematical principles, this is the point where 'mystery' comes onto the stage. Is it really pure coincidence? Do we know all the rules or is there maybe a creative forces that guided this particles to the given result? At the end of the day, after you've done all the strictly mathematical work and you know your facts to be firm and steady, you can't help but start wondering about this questions at least a very little bit.
And mr. King of Pop, I'm sorry for the lame title I came up with for this thread. I'll keep your remarks in mind ... not  _________________ Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.
|
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | |
 | |
Le Néant Dr. Darwin Spacetime

Gender: Number of posts: 1161 Registration date: 2008-06-08
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:58 pm | |
| I think I'm just a wondering wanderer!  _________________ Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.
|
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:00 pm | |
| There's a small church near us, called "The Searchers' Church." I hear they welcome wanderers. |
|
 | |
John McLaughlin Head Wankee
Gender: Number of posts: 1580 Registration date: 2008-06-09
 | Subject: Re: A reasonable denial of God Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:16 am | |
| - "There lives more faith in honest doubt Believe me, than in half the creeds" - Alfred Lord Tennyson. |
|
 | |
| | A reasonable denial of God | |
|